Value of allergen nasal provocation test in assessment of the efficacy of house dust mites specific immunotherapy / 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

Objective:To investigate the value of nasal provocation test（NPT） in evaluating the efficacy of allergen immunotherapy（AIT） in patients with dust mite induced allergic rhinitis（AR）. Methods:A total of 83 patients with dust mite induced AR with/without asthma were included. Symptom score（SS）, daily medication score（DMS）, combined symptom and medication score（CSMS）, rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire（RQLQ）, NPT and skin prick test（SPT） were assessed before and after 1 year AIT. Results:There were statistical differences in SS（P<0.000 1）, DMS（P<0.000 1）, CSMS（P<0.000 1）, and RQLQ（P<0.000 1） after 1 year of AIT compared with pre-treatment. The effective rate of CSMS was 73.49%, and the effective rate of NPT was 42.17%. CSMS was consistent with NPT in efficacy assessment（Kappa=0.437, P<0.001）; while in 54 patients with pre-treatment NPT concentrations other than the original concentration, CMSM and NPT showed better consistence（Kappa=0.895, P<0.001）. Among the 48 patients with ineffective NPT assessment in the first year, 25 patients completed the second-year follow-up, and 12 patients（48.00%） showed effective in NPT. However, 10 out of 12 patients（83.33%） with NPT concentration other than original solution pre-treatment showed effective NPT at the second year. Conclusion:NPT can be used as one of the indicators for efficacy evaluation for dust mite induced AR patients, especially for patients with positive NPT induced at lower concentrations before treatment.

Compliance and withdraw reason of sublingual immunotherapy in 245 patients with allergic rhinitis / 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

Objective:To investigate the compliance of patients with allergic rhinitis（AR） receiving sublingual immunotherapy and its influencing factors. Methods:The clinical data of 291 AR patients who received sublingual immunotherapy for dust mites at the First Hospital of Peking University from January 2016 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, and their outpatient or telephone follow-up was conducted. For patients whose treatment time was less than 2 years, the time and reason for the loss were recorded, and the factors affecting their compliance were discussed from the aspects of gender, age, and education. Results:Among the 291 patients, 245 cases（84.2%） were successfully followed up, and 193 cases（78.8%） fell off midway（treatment time<2 years）. The overall compliance rate was 21.22%（52/245）. The compliance rate of children is higher than that of adults（χ²=21.306, P<0.05）, and gender and education level have no significant effect on the compliance rate. The time period for the largest number of shedding was 6-<12 months after treatment（68 cases, 27.8%）. The main cause of shedding was symptom relief, which was considered cured（16.7%）. Secondly, within 3 months after treatment, a total of 61 patients（24.9%） fell off, of which 34 cases（13.9%） fell off because of troublesome medication, often missed medication, and simply stopped taking the drug. Statistics on the overall reasons for shedding in 193 patients, the top three shedding reasons were: cured after symptom relief（59 cases, 30.6%）, troublesome medication, discontinuation after missed dose（44 cases, 22.8%）, slow onset or ineffectiveness（26 cases, 13.5%）. Conclusion:The overall compliance of sublingual immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis is poor, and the compliance of children is better than that of adults. Clinicians should focus on the reasons for patients to fall off at various times, strengthen patient education, enhance patient confidence in treatment, and improve the compliance of patients.

Environment control and healthy education are the most important methods for prevention and treatment of allergic rhinitis / 中华预防医学杂志

The almost all guidelines of allergic rhinitis (AR) diagnosis and treatment in the world agree the strategy of "combination of prevention and treatment, four in one". There are more descriptions about anti-allergic medications and allergen immunotherapy (AIT), but less contents of environmental control and health education. It is necessary to emphasize again that clinicians must attach great importance to environmental control and strengthen health education in order to realize the three-level prevention of AR and reduce its harm.

Atualização em reações de hipersensibilidade aos anti-inflamatórios não esteroidais ­ Parte 2: manifestações clínicas, fenótipos, diagnóstico e manejo / Update on hypersensitivity reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ­ Part 2: clinical features, phenotypes, diagnosis, and management

Os anti-inflamatórios não esteroidais (AINE) são os fármacos mais frequentemente associados a reações de hipersensibilidade (RH) na prática clínica. Na parte 2 dessa atualização sobre as RH aos AINE, discutiremos os aspectos clínicos dessas reações, com foco nos sinais e sintomas, como diferenciar os fenótipos clínicos, fazer a orientação desses pacientes e quando indicar procedimentos complementares, como testes cutâneos, de provocação e dessensibilização.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are a major cause of drug hypersensitivity reactions in clinical practice. In this "Update Part 2", we discuss the clinical picture, including the main signs and symptoms, how to distinguish clinical phenotypes, how to manage affected patients, and when to indicate additional procedures, such as skin testing, challenge, and desensitization.

Reacciones de hipersensibilidad a quimioterapéuticos y biológicos / Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutics and biologics

Las reacciones a medicamentos han aumentado con el tiempo, estas implican ahora una carga importante de enfermedad, principalmente en los servicios de hospitalización. Los agentes quimioterapéuticos y biológicos son fármacos utilizados con frecuencia en enfermedades reumatológicas y neoplasias de diferente orden. Las reacciones de hipersensibilidad a quimioterapéuticos y monoclonales impactan en la calidad de vida, el pronóstico y la mortalidad de los pacientes con enfermedades autoinmunes y cáncer, es por eso que deben ser reconocidas y manejadas por un equipo de trabajo multidisciplinar. La desensibilización es una herramienta terapéutica que ofrece grandes beneficios a los pacientes con reacciones de hipersensibilidad, permitiéndoles la utilización de medicamentos de primera línea de manera segura y costoefectiva, con un impacto importante en la morbilidad y mortalidad de estos pacientes. El objetivo de este artículo fue revisar la información y evidencia más reciente sobre las reacciones de hipersensibilidad a quimioterapéuticos y biológicos, y los datos sobre las opciones de desensibilización con estos medicamentos y su desenlace

Drug reactions have increased over time, they now imply a significant burden of disease mainly in hospital services. Chemotherapeutic and biological agents are drugs frequently used in different rheumatological diseases and neoplasms. Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic and monoclonal drugs impact the quality of life, prognosis and mortality of patients with autoimmune diseases and cancer, that is why they must be recognized and managed by a multidisciplinary team. Desensitization is a therapeutic tool that offers great benefits to patients with hypersensitivity reactions, allowing them to use first-line drugs in a safe and cost-effective manner, with a significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality. The objective of this article was to review the most recent information and evidence on hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutics and biologics, and data on desensitization options with these drugs and their outcome

Reacciones de hipersensibilidad a alglucosidasa alfa en enfermedad de Pompe: dos casos de desensibilización exitosa / Hypersensitivity reactions to alglucosidase alfa in Pompe disease: two cases of successful desensitization

La enfermedad de Pompe es un desorden neuromuscular autosómico recesivo de baja prevalencia, causado por la deficiencia total o parcial de la enzima alfa glucosidasa ácida (GAA), cuya única terapia de reemplazo enzimático disponible es la alglucosidasa alfa recombinante. Las reacciones adversas asociadas a la infusión se presentan con frecuencia. Se reportan dos casos de desensibilización exitosa con alglucosidasa alfa utilizando protocolos con dosis meta de 20 mg/kg, administrados quincenalmente; el primero de ellos, en una niña con historia de reacción adversa grave a los 15 meses de edad, en quien se utilizó un esquema con una dilución inicial de 1/10.000.000 de 28 pasos y una duración total de 13,1 horas. En el segundo caso, la paciente tuvo una reacción adversa grave a los 4 años de edad, se utilizó el protocolo de 22 pasos, concentración inicial de 1/1.000.000 y duración total de 7,2 horas. Se concluye que en pacientes con enfermedad de Pompe que presentan reacciones adversas durante la terapia de reemplazo enzimático, es posible realizar la desensibilización cada dos semanas con la dosis estándar de 20 mg/kg de forma exitosa, y progresivamente lograr la administración usual de la infusión

Pompe disease is a low prevalence autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder, caused by total or partial deficiency of the acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA) enzyme, and its only available enzyme replacement therapy is the recombinant alglucosidase alfa. Infusion-associated adverse reactions occur frequently. Two cases of successful desensitization with alglucosidase alfa using protocols with a target dose of 20 mg/kg administered biweekly are reported; the first was a girl who had a history of serious adverse reaction at the age of 15 months, and undergone to a scheme with an initial dilution of 1/10,000,000 with 28 steps and a total duration of 13.1 hours. In the second case, the patient had a severe adverse reaction at the age of 4 years, a 22-step protocol was used with an initial concentration of 1/1,000,000 and a total duration of 7.2 hours. In conclusion, in patients with Pompe disease who presented adverse reactions during enzyme replacement therapy with alglucosidase alfa, it is possible to perform desensitization every two weeks with the standard dose of 20 mg/kg, and progressively achieve the usual administration of the infusion

Predictive model of curative effect of mite subcutaneous immunotherapy in 5-18 years of age patients with allergic asthma / 中华儿科杂志

Objective: To analyze the factors affecting the efficacy of mite subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) in allergic asthma patients aged 5-18 years, and to find the best predictive model for the curative effect. Methods: The data of 688 patients aged 5-18 years with allergic asthma who completed more than 3 years of mite SCIT from December 2006 to November 2021 in the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. Male, results of skin prick test (SPT), age, daily medication score (DMS), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and enrollment season were defined as independent variables. R language models, including Logistic regression model, random forest model and extreme gradient boosting (XGboost) model, were used to analyze the impact of these independent variables on the outcomes. The receiver operating characteristic curve was applied to compare the predictive ability of the models. Hypothesis testing of the area under curve (AUC) of the 3 models was performed using DeLong test. Results: There were 435 males and 253 females in the 688 patients. There were 349 patients aged 5-<8 years, 240 patients aged 8-<11 years, and 99 patients aged 11-18 years. SPT showed that 429 cases (62.4%) were only allergic to mite, and 259 cases (37.7%) were also allergic to other allergens. According to the efficacy after 3 years of SCIT, 351 cases (51.0%) discontinued the treatment and 337 cases (49.0%) required continued treatment. The DMS was 4 (3, 6) at initiation, 3 (2, 5) at 3 months, 3 (2, 5) at 4 months, 2 (1, 3) at 12 months, and 0 (0, 1) at 3 years of SCIT treatment. The VAS was 3.5 (2.5, 5.2) at initiation, 3.2 (2.2, 4.8) at 3 months, 2.6 (1.4, 4.1) at 4 months, 1.0 (0.6, 1.8) at 12 months, and 0.5 (0, 1.2) at 3 years of treatment. At 3, 4, and 12 months, the rate of decline in DMS was 0 (0, 20%), 16.7% (0, 33.3%), and 50.0% (31.0%, 75.0%), respectively; and the VAS decreased by 7.1% (3.2%,13.8%), 27.6% (16.7%,44.4%), and 70.2% (56.1%, 82.3%), respectively. Regarding the enrollment season, 99 cases were in spring, 230 cases in summer, 171 cases in autumn, and 188 cases in winter. The R language Logistic regression model found that DMS>3 points at 3 months (OR=-3.5, 95%CI:-4.3--2.7, P<0.01), male (OR=-1.7, 95%CI:-2.3--1.0), P<0.01), DMS decline rate>16.7% at 4 months (OR=-1.6, 95%CI:-2.3--0.8, P<0.01) and DMS decline rate>0 at 3 months (OR=-0.7, 95%CI:-1.3--0.2, P<0.05) had higher possibility of drug discontinuation; whereas, the decline rate of DMS at 12 months>50.0% (OR=0.7, 95%CI: 0.1-1.3, P<0.05), VAS at 12 months>1.0 points (OR=0.9, 95%CI: 0.3-1.6, P<0.05), and initial VAS<4.0 points (OR=1.0, 95%CI: 0.4-1.6, P<0.01) had lower possibility of drug discontinuation. Both the random forest model and the XGboost model showed that DMS>3 points at 3 months (mean decrease accuracy=30.9, importance=0.45) had the greatest impact on drug discontinuation. The AUC of the random forest model was the largest at 0.900, with an accuracy of 78.2% and a sensitivity of 84.5%. Logistic regression model had AUC of 0.891, accuracy of 80.0%, and sensitivity of 80.0%; XGboost model had AUC of 0.886, accuracy of 76.9%, and sensitivity of 84.5%. The AUC of the pairwise comparison model by DeLong test found that all three models could be used for the prediction of this data set (all P>0.05). Conclusions: The more drugs used to control the primary disease, and the more careful reduction of the control medicine after starting SCIT treatment, the more favorable it is to stop all drugs after 3 years. The random forest model is the best predictive model for the efficacy of mite SCIT in asthmatic children.

Molecular diagnosis and immunotherapy selection in a Portuguese population sensitized to grass and olive pollens / Diagnóstico molecular e seleção de imunoterapia numa população portuguesa sensibilizada ao pólen de gramíneas e de oliveira

Introduction: Phleum pratense (Phl p) and Olea europaea (Ole e) are common allergenic pollen. Objectives: To describe the sensitization patterns to Phl p and Ole e allergens in a subset of allergic rhinitis patients with positive skin prick tests (SPTs) to these pollens and compare the allergen immunotherapy (AIT) choice before and after determination of molecular components. Methods: Candidates to pollen immunotherapy with positive SPTs to both Phl p and Ole e were recruited. All of them underwent an SPT with a panel of aeroallergens and measurements of serum specific IgE (sIgE) to Phl p, Ole e, Phl p1, Phl p5, Phl p7, Phl p12, Ole e1, Ole e7, and Bet v2. Results: Forty adults were included. Of these, 83% and 65% were sIgE-positive to Phl p and Ole e, using the 0.35 kUA/L and 0.70 kUA/L cut-offs, respectively. Moreover, 42.5% of patients had positive sIgE to Phl p1 and/or Phl p5, 2.5% only to Ole e1, and 47.5% to both (0.35 kUA/L cutoff). By increasing the cut-off to 0.7 kUA/L, 55% of patients were sensitized to Phl p1 and/or Phl p5, and no patient was sensitized only to Ole e1. After component-resolved diagnosis, AIT choice was changed in 15 (37.5%) patients, with a decrease in the number of prescriptions of AIT with both grass and olive pollens and with olive alone, together with an increase in the prescriptions of AIT with grass pollen alone. Conclusion: Genuine sensitization to Olea europaea was reduced, and the sensitization patterns were heterogeneous. Knowledge of pattern of sensitization to molecular components changed immunotherapy prescription in more than one third of the patients.

Introdução: Os polens de Phleum pratense (Phl p) e de Olea europaea (Ole e) são fontes alergênicas comuns. Objetivos: Descrever os padrões de sensibilização aos alergênios destes dois polens num subconjunto de pacientes com rinite alérgica polínica e comparar a escolha de imunoterapia, antes e depois da determinação de alergênios moleculares para Phl p e Ole e. Métodos: Foram recrutados candidatos para imunoterapia com polens, com testes cutâneos positivos para Phl p e Ole e. Todos realizaram um painel de testes em picada a aeroalergênios e determinação de IgE séricas específicas para Phl p, Ole e, rPhl p1, rPhl p5, rPhl p7, rPhl p 12, rOle e 1, nOle e 7, rBet v2. Resultados: Foram incluídos 40 adultos. Em relação à sIgE para Phl p e Ole e, 83% e 65% dos pacientes apresentaram positividade para ambos, usando o cut-off de 0,35 kUA/L e 0,70 kUA/L, respectivamente. A positividade para Phl p1 e/ou Phl p 5 foi encontrada em 42,5%, para Ole e 1 apenas em 2,5%, enquanto 47,5% apresentaram sIgE positivo para ambos (cut-off corte de 0,35 kUA/L). Aumentando o cut-off para 0,7 kUA/L, 55% foram sensibilizados para Phl p1 e/ou Phl p5, nenhum paciente foi sensibilizado apenas para Ole e 1. Após a determinação dos alergênios para os componentes moleculares, a escolha de imunoterapia foi alterada em 15 (37,5%) pacientes, com uma diminuição no número de vacinas para Phleum + Olea e apenas para Olea e um aumento na prescrição de vacinas para Phleum. Conclusão: A sensibilização genuína do Olea europaea foi reduzida e os padrões de sensibilização foram heterogêneos. O conhecimento da sensibilização aos componentes moleculares dos alergênios mudou a prescrição de imunoterapia em mais de um terço dos pacientes.

Protocolo de desensibilización rápida en pacientes con reacción moderada a severa de hipersensibilidad a citostáticos / Rapid desensitization protocol in patients with moderate to severe hypersensitivity reaction to cytostatics

Introducción: La desensibilización rápida a medicamentos induce una tolerancia temporal a los quimioterapéuticos que provocan reacciones de hipersensibilidad. Objetivo: Evaluar el protocolo de desensibilización rápida en escenario ambulatorio en pacientes que presentaron reacciones de hipersensibilidad a fármacos citotóxicos. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, y retrospectivo, de 30 pacientes con cáncer que desarrollaron reacciones de hipersensibilidad entre los años 2016 y 2018, tratados en el Hospital de Día del Servicio de Oncología del Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos Ameijeiras. Se clasificaron según su intensidad, y se analizaron variables demográficas, características clínicas, y síntomas presentados. Se utilizó un protocolo en doce etapas basado en tres diluciones del fármaco. Se administró premedicación en todos los casos. Se realizó estadística descriptiva, y para la asociación entre variables, se utilizó la prueba estadística Chi-cuadrado. Resultados: La mediana de edad fue 54 años (23;77). Predominaron las mujeres; los menores de 60 años; tumor primario de colon; antecedentes de alergia; el oxaliplatino como fármaco más implicado; las RHS durante la infusión; e intensidad moderada. Fueron más frecuentes los síntomas cutáneos y gastrointestinales. Con la aplicación del protocolo se completó la quimioterapia planificada a los 30 pacientes (145 ciclos adicionales). Solo se presentaron ocho desensibilizaciones con reacciones leves de tipo cutáneas. El 94,5 por ciento de las desensibilizaciones no presentaron reacción alguna. Conclusiones: Constituye el primer reporte nacional de la utilización exitosa de un protocolo de desensibilización rápida a citostáticos que demostró ser eficaz y seguro en el escenario ambulatorio, con un manejo multidisciplinario(AU)

Introduction: Rapid desensitization to drugs induces a temporary tolerance to chemotherapeutics causing hypersensitivity reactions. Objective: To evaluate the rapid desensitization protocol in an outpatient setting in patients who had hypersensitivity reactions to cytotoxic drugs. Methods: An observational and retrospective study was carried out in 30 cancer patients, who developed hypersensitivity reactions, from 2016 to 2018. They were treated in the outpatient Oncology service at Hermanos Ameijeiras Surgical Clinical Hospital. These subjects were classified according to intensity; demographic variables, clinical characteristics, and symptoms were analyzed. A twelve-step protocol based on three dilutions of the drug was used. Premedication was administered in all cases. Descriptive statistics and for the association between variables were performed. Chi-square statistical test was used. Results: The median age was 54 years (23; 77). Predominance was observed in women, those under 60 years of age, primary colon tumor, history of allergy, oxaliplatin as the drug most implicated, HRH during infusion, and moderate intensity. Skin and gastrointestinal symptoms were more frequent. The planned chemotherapy was completed with the application of the protocol, in all 30 patients (145 additional cycles). There were only eight desensitization with mild skin-type reactions. 94.5 percent of desensitizations did not show any reaction. Conclusions: It constitutes the first national report of successful use of a rapid desensitization protocol to cytostatics that proved to be effective and safe in the outpatient setting with multidisciplinary management(AU)

Posicionamento da Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia sobre o manejo da imunoterapia específica com alérgenos (ITA) em pacientes vacinados contra COVID­19 / Position statement of the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology on the management of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) in patients vaccinated against COVID­19

A pandemia de COVID-19 representa um grande desafio para todas as especialidades médicas. A imunoterapia com alérgenos (ITA) é considerada o único procedimento terapêutico capaz de modificar a história natural das doenças alérgicas, e caracteriza o estado da arte na área de Alergia e Imunologia. Esta estratégia terapêutica de imunomodulação é capaz de promover a remissão e controle das doenças alérgicas por períodos prolongados, mesmo após o seu término. Existem poucos dados em relação ao emprego da ITA em pacientes vacinados contra COVID-19, e até o momento não há um posicionamento oficial das sociedades internacionais da área de Alergia e Imunologia Clínica. Este documento tem como objetivo estabelecer recomendações práticas para o manejo da ITA em pacientes que receberam a vacina contra COVID-19. Os fenômenos imunológicos envolvidos na imunoprofilaxia vacinal e no mecanismo de ação da ITA foram comparados, proporcionando o estabelecimento de recomendações precisas.

The COVID-19 pandemic represents a serious challenge for all medical specialties. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is considered the only therapeutic procedure capable of modifying the natural history of allergic diseases and characterizes the state of the art in the field of allergy and immunology. This therapeutic strategy of immunomodulation is able to promote remission and control of allergic diseases for prolonged periods, even after cessation. There are few data regarding use of AIT in patients vaccinated against COVID-19 and, to date, there is no official position statement published by international allergy and clinical immunology societies. This document aims to establish practical recommendations for the management of AIT in patients who have received the COVID-19 vaccine. The immunological mechanisms involved in immunoprophylaxis with vaccines and the mechanism of action of AIT have been compared to provide a solid basis for establishing precise recommendations.

Listeriose em pacientes nefropatas imunossuprimidos - relato de dois casos / Listeriosis in patients immunosuppressed nephropaths - report of two cases

Contexto: A Listeria monocytogenes é um bacilo gram-positivo de baixa patogenicidade na população geral, mas importante causa de mortalidade por sepse e meningite em pacientes imunocomprometidos. Receptores de órgãos sólidos e candidatos em tratamento de dessensibilização são suscetíveis à infecção pela Listeria monocytogenes, embora sua apresentação clínica seja pouco reconhecida. Descrição dos casos: Paciente do sexo masculino, 43 anos, internado devido a rejeição aguda de enxerto pós-transplante renal, apresenta pico febril matutino e cefaleia. Paciente do sexo feminino, 59 anos, com doença renal crônica e em terapia de dessensibilização devido reatividade a painel antígeno leucocitário humano, busca pronto-socorro com febre, cefaleia e diarreia. A infecção por Listeria monocytogenes foi confirmada por hemocultura em ambos os casos. Discussão: A ocorrência de listeriose é esporádica e associada ao consumo de alimentos altamente contaminados, como laticínios, produtos frescos e carnes processadas. A redução da imunocompetência é o principal fator de risco para o desenvolvimento da doença em não gestantes, bem como para o aumento da mortalidade. O diagnóstico é estabelecido majoritariamente por hemocultura e o exame do líquido cefalorraquidiano é imprescindível para acessar o acometimento do sistema nervoso central, uma vez que os sinais meníngeos podem estar ausentes. O tratamento é realizado com beta-lactâmicos ou aminoglicosídeos. A ampicilina foi utilizada nos casos relatados e promoveu boa resposta clínica. Conclusão: Os profissionais devem atentar para a gravidade da infecção por Listeria monocytogenes e considerar sua ocorrência em pacientes imunocomprometidos, fornecendo orientações profiláticas a todos os candidatos a transplante de órgãos sólidos e tratamento empírico nos casos suspeitos.

Desensibilización con idursulfase en un niño con síndrome de Hunter (mucopolisacaridosis II) / Idursulfase desensitization in a child with Hunter syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis ii)

La terapia de reemplazo enzimático disminuye la morbilidad y mejora la calidad de vida de los pacientes con mucopolisacaridosisii. Se han descrito reacciones de hipersensibilidad inmediata a este fármaco. La desensibilización es un tratamiento que induce la tolerancia temporaria a una droga y permite al paciente alérgico recibir la medicación.Se presenta el caso de un niño de 7 años con diagnóstico de síndrome de Hunter que, luego de 4 años de tratamiento con idursulfase, tuvo dos episodios de anafilaxia durante la infusión del fármaco. Se detectó inmunoglubulina E específica mediante pruebas cutáneas, y fue positiva la intradermorreacción con dilución 1/10 (0,2 mg/ml). Se realizó un protocolo de desensibilización de 12 pasos, sin presentar eventos adversos. La evaluación alergológica y la posibilidad de desensibilización constituyeron herramientas útiles en el manejo de nuestro paciente

Enzyme replacement therapy with idursulfase decreases morbidity and improves quality of life of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis ii. Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to this drug have been described. Desensitization is a treatment that induces temporary tolerance to a culprit drug, allowing the allergic patient to receive the medication.We present the case of a 7-year-old patient diagnosed with Hunter syndrome who presented, after 4 years of treatment, two episodes of anaphylaxis during the infusion of idursulfase. Detection of specific immunoglobulin E was carried out using skin tests, with intradermal reaction at a 1/10 dilution (0.2 mg/ml) being positive. A 12-step desensitization protocol was performed without presenting adverse events.The allergological evaluation and the possibility of desensitization were useful tools in the management of our patient.

Loss of tolerance 5 days after discontinuing sulphonamide introduced via desensitization in delayed reaction / Perda da tolerância 5 dias após suspensão de sulfonamida introduzida através de dessensibilização por reação tardia

ABSTRACT The fixed drug eruption is a non-immediate hypersensitivity reaction to drug, characterized by recurrent erythematous or violaceous, rounded, well-defined border plaques, which always appear in the same location every time the culprit drug is administered. The usual practice is to avoid the drug involved and to use a structurally different drug. However, there are situations in which there is no safe and effective therapy. In such situations, desensitization is the only option. We describe the case of a patient who presented fixed eruption due to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, who underwent successful desensitization, but required a repeat procedure twice due to relapse after inadvertent full-dose reintroduction. In non-immediate hypersensitivity reaction to drug, the indication is controversial and there is no technical standardization. Furthermore, the time at which such tolerance is lost after discontinuing the drug involved is unknown. In severe non-immediate reactions of types II and III, desensitization is contraindicated. The patient underwent desensitisation to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim three times − the first with recurrence of lesions and the second and third without manifestations, all concluded successfully and with no premedication.

RESUMO A erupção fixa por drogas é uma reação de hipersensibilidade a medicamento não imediata, caracterizada por placas eritematosas ou violáceas, arredondadas, recorrentes, de bordas bem definidas e que aparecem sempre na mesma localização cada vez que o medicamento culpado é administrado. A prática habitual é evitar a droga envolvida e utilizar um medicamento estruturalmente diferente. Contudo, há situações em que não há terapêutica segura e eficaz. Em tais situações, a dessensibilização é a única opção. Descrevemos o caso de um paciente que apresentou erupção fixa por drogas por sulfametoxazol-trimetoprim, tendo sido submetido à dessensibilização com sucesso, mas necessitou repetição do procedimento duas vezes, por recidiva da reação após reintrodução inadvertida em dose plena. Em reação de hipersensibilidade a medicamento não imediata, a indicação é controversa e não há padronização técnica. Além disso, não se conhece o tempo durante o qual essa tolerância é perdida após a suspensão da droga envolvida. Nas reações não imediatas graves e dos tipos II e III, a dessensibilização está contraindicada. O paciente foi submetido a dessensibilização ao sulfametoxazol-trimetoprim por três vezes − a primeira com recorrência de lesões, e a segunda e terceira sem manifestações, sendo todas concluídas com sucesso e sem uso de pré-medicação.

Systemic reactions to subcutaneous immunotherapy for bronchial asthma and/or allergic rhinitis in children and their risk factors / 中国当代儿科杂志

OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the incidence of systemic reactions (SR) to subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) for bronchial asthma and/or allergic rhinitis in children and their risk factors.@*METHODS@#A retrospective analysis was performed on 198 children with bronchial and/or allergic rhinitis. According to the presence or absence of SR and local reactions (LR) during SCIT, the patients were divided into two groups: SR (with SR and LR, n=31) and control (without SR or LR, n=142). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors associated with SR.@*RESULTS@#Among the 198 patients who received 8 157 injections of SCIT, 25 (12.6%) experienced SR (31 times, 0.38%), including grade I SR (18 times, 58%), grade II SR (10 times, 32%), grade III SR (3 times, 10%), and no grade IV SR. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that multiple sensitization with both food and inhaled allergens, specific IgE to dust mites (grade 6), total IgE (grade 6), and a history of LR were independent risk factors for SR (P<0.05).@*CONCLUSIONS@#SCIT is a safe treatment for bronchial asthma and/or allergic rhinitis in children, with a low incidence of SR. Children with multiple sensitization with both food and inhaled allergens, a hypersensitive state (specific IgE to dust mites, grade 6; total IgE, grade 6), and a history of LR have an increased risk of SR to SCIT.

Efficacy of Allergen Immunotherapy for Allergic Asthma in Real World Practice

PURPOSE: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) induces immunological tolerance, and there is increasing evidence of the clinical efficacy of AIT in the treatment of allergic asthma. However, the optimal parameters for asthma control in clinical trials are still unclear. We investigated the efficacy of AIT with respect to changes in the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose in patients with allergic asthma. METHODS: A total of 117 adults with allergic asthma who had used ICS for more than 1 year in a single tertiary hospital in Korea were included in this retrospective study. We compared the clinical parameters and outcomes between the AIT group (ICS with AIT, n = 48) and the non-AIT group (ICS without AIT, n = 69) by applying an inverse probability of treatment weighting method. The patients in the AIT group had received subcutaneous AIT monthly as a maintenance treatment for more than 1 year. The changes in the ICS dose from baseline were evaluated in the 2 groups for 3 years. RESULTS: The proportion of responders who discontinued or decreased in the ICS dose with achieving control status of asthma was significantly higher in the AIT group than in the non-AIT group throughout the study period (at 6 months, 52.1% vs. 24.6%; at 1 year, 70.8% vs. 34.7%; at 2 years, 89.5% vs. 35.6%; at 3 years, 96.3% vs. 51.2%). Treatment responses did not differ significantly by type of allergen (single- or multi-allergens or 3 different products) used throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the type of allergen, long-term maintenance AIT helps to spare ICS dose and achieve better control in patients with allergic asthma in real-world clinical practice.

Contribution of molecular diagnosis to bee venom allergic patients with systemic reactions during the build-up phase of bee venom immunotherapy / Contribuição do diagnóstico molecular em doentes alérgicos ao veneno de abelha com reações sistêmicas durante o ultra-rush

Introduction: Bee venom (BV) allergy is one of the most common causes of severe anaphylaxis. Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is considered the most effective treatment, but systemic reactions may occur. This study aimed to characterize the sensitization profile by molecular components of patients with BV anaphylaxis under VIT and to evaluate whether systemic reactions during the build-up phase of VIT protocol are related to different sensitization patterns. Methods: A retrospective study of 30 patients under VIT for 1 year. The group of patients who reacted during the build-up phase (group A) was compared with the group with no reactions (group B). Specific IgE (sIgE) and IgG4 (sIgG4) for BV and recombinants (rApi m1, rApi m2, rApi m3, rApi m5, and rApi m10) were evaluated before and 1 year after VIT. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism v5.01. Results: Men accounted for 80% of the sample, and mean age was 47 years (14-74 years). Group A consisted of 10 patients, and group B of 20 patients. Before VIT, sIgE to rApi m1 was detected in 86.7% of patients, rApi m2 in 46.7%, rApi m3 in 16.7%, rApi m5 in 43.3%, and rApi m10 in 70%. Positive results to at least 1 BV allergen were detected in 100%; 73% of patients were sensitized to >1 allergen, and 13.3% to all allergens. The profile of the two groups did not differ significantly before VIT, but group B showed a significant decrease in whole BV extract (p=0.045), rApi m 3 (p=0.017), and rApi m 10 (p=0.021) 1 year after VIT. Regarding sIgG4, there was a significant increase in rApi m1, which was not observed in other allergens, such as rApi m3 and rApi m10. Conclusion: The analysis of a panel of BV recombinants can improve diagnostic sensitivity, when compared to rApi m1 alone. There was no association between systemic reactions during the build-up phase of VIT and molecular sensitization profile. Nevertheless, it is important to study a greater number of patients.

Introdução: A alergia ao veneno de abelha (VA) é uma das causas mais comuns de anafilaxia grave. A imunoterapia com veneno de abelha (VIT) é considerada o tratamento mais eficaz, mas reações sistêmicas podem ocorrer. O objetivo deste estudo foi caracterizar o perfil de sensibilização por componentes moleculares de doentes com anafilaxia a VA e avaliar se reações sistêmicas durante o ultrarush estão relacionadas com diferentes padrões de sensibilização. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo incluindo 30 doentes submetidos a VIT durante 1 ano. Considerou-se dois grupos: grupo de doentes que reagiu durante o ultra-rush (Grupo A), que foi comparado com o grupo sem reação (Grupo B). Foram avaliadas as IgE (sIgE) e IgG4 (sIgG4) específicas para VA(i1) e componentes moleculares: rApi m1, rApi m2, rApi m3, rApi m5 e rApi m10 antes e 1 ano após VIT. Os testes estatísticos foram realizados com Graph-PadPrism v5.01. Resultados: 80% sexo masculino, média de idade 47 anos (14-74). Grupo A com 10 doentes, Grupo B com 20 doentes. Previamente à VIT, sIgE para rApi m1 foi detectada em 86,7%; rApi m2 em 46,7%; rApi m3 em 16,7%; rApi m5 em 43,3%; e rApi m10 em 70%. Resultados positivos para pelo menos um alergênio de VA foram detectados em 100%. 73% dos doentes eram sensibilizados a mais de um alergênio, e 13,3% a todos os alergênios. Não houve diferenças estatisticamente significativas no perfil dos dois grupos antes da VIT, porém verificouse uma diminuição significativa: p = 0,045; p = 0,017 e p = 0,021 de i1, rApi m3 e rApi m10, respectivamente, no grupo B um ano após VIT. Relativamente à sIgG4, observou-se um aumento significativo de rApi m1, não observado nos restantes alergênios como rApi m3 e rApi m10. Conclusão: A análise de um painel de recombinantes de VA pode melhorar a sensibilidade diagnóstica, quando comparado com rApi m1 isolado. Não se verificou associação entre a ocorrência de reações sistêmicas durante o ultra-rush e o perfil de sensibilização molecular. No entanto, é importante para estudar um maior número de doentes.

Imunoterapia e imunobiológicos na dermatite atópica / Immunotherapy and immunobiologicals in atopic dermatitis

Na última década, avanços consideráveis na compreensão da patogênese da dermatite atópica têm pavimentado a via de um número de novos tratamentos. A melhora da imunoterapia subcutânea com alérgenos e a introdução da imunoterapia sublingual deram lugar à prospecção de sua aplicação para adultos e crianças portadoras de dermatite atópica. Esta revisão apresenta resultados das pesquisas científicas, análises sistemáticas e metanálises que confirmam a eficácia clínica da imunoterapia com alérgenos para pacientes com dermatite atópica de curso moderado ou grave, que apresentam sensibilização a aeroalérgenos. Apresentamos também novas informações de como usar os bioterapêuticos que estão levando a tentativas mais eficazes de tratamento. A esperança é de que estes novos biológicos ou antagonistas de pequenas moléculas, que têm alta especificidade para as moléculas-alvo, possam diminuir os efeitos indesejáveis causados pelos agentes imunossupressivos sem um alvo específico, como os observados pelas drogas de ampla ação biológica. Com o desenvolvimento e subsequentemente com a aprovação dos bioterapêuticos pelas agências reguladoras, nós começamos a ver uma revolução clínica e terapêutica no tratamento da dermatite atópica. As fontes de dados incluíram artigos originais, revisões e publicações indexados nos bancos de dados PubMed, MEDLINE, LILACS, SciELO e publicações on-line nos últimos 15 anos. Como resultado, uma nova era no tratamento de pacientes com doenças crônicas graves está em andamento na nossa especialidade. O uso de imunoterapia subcutânea, imunoterapia sublingual e bioterapêuticos para dermatite atópica prometem grande precisão e efetividade na medicina personalizada.

In the past decade, considerable advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis have paved the way for a number of new treatments. The improvement of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy and the introduction of sublingual immunotherapy provided prospects of their administration both for adults and children suffering from atopic dermatitis. This review includes results of scientific studies, systematic reviews and metaanalyses that confirm the clinical efficacy of allergen immunotherapy for patients with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis who are sensitive to aeroallergens. Also, new information on how the use of biotherapeutics is leading to more effective approaches to treatment is presented. Hopefully these new biologicals or small molecule antagonists, which have high specificity for their target molecules, will decrease the undesirable off-target effects commonly observed with current immunosuppressive agents that are characterized by broad biological actions. With the development and subsequent regulatory approval of biotherapeutic agents, a clinical and therapeutic revolution has begun in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Data sources included original articles, reviews and related texts published over the past 15 years, retrieved from PubMed, MEDLINE, LILACS and SciELO databases and other online publications. As a result, a new era in the treatment of patients with severe chronic diseases has been observed in our specialty. The use of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy, sublingual immunotherapy and biotherapeutics for atopic dermatitis promises greater precision and effectiveness in a personalized medicine.

Segurança da vacina de febre amarela em pacientes comprovadamente alérgicos à proteína do ovo / Safety of yellow fever vaccine in egg allergic patients

Introdução: A vacina de febre amarela, recomendada em áreas endêmicas, é contraindicada em alérgicos à proteína do ovo (APO) por ser cultivada em ovos de galinha embrionados. Objetivo: O objetivo do estudo foi mostrar a segurança da vacina de febre amarela em pacientes comprovadamente APO. Método: Foi realizado estudo prospectivo em hospital quaternário, no período de janeiro a outubro de 2018. Foram incluídos pacientes com APO confirmada por teste de provocação oral (TPO), reação anafilática à proteína do ovo nos últimos 6 meses, ou reação de APO nos últimos 2 meses associada à IgE específica positiva. Todos foram submetidos ao teste de puntura com a vacina na apresentação pura. Se negativo, realizado teste intradérmico (ID) com a vacina na diluição de 1:100. Se ID negativo, vacina aplicada em dose plena. Se teste de puntura ou ID positivo, vacina aplicada fracionada segundo protocolo de dessensibilização. Resultados: Dos 78 pacientes com história presumida de APO, confirmou-se o diagnóstico em 43 (30M:13F, mediana idade 2,7 a): 30 por TPO, 7 com anafilaxia em menos de 6 meses da vacina, e 6 com reação imediata após ingestão do ovo há menos de 2 meses e IgE específica positiva. Durante o TPO, 12 apresentaram anafilaxia, e os demais (18) apresentaram urticária e/ou angioedema ou vômitos. Todos os testes de puntura (43) foram negativos. ID foi negativo em 37 pacientes, que receberam a dose plena da vacina, sem reações. Apenas 6 apresentaram ID positivo e necessitaram dessensibilização para vacina. Metade desses pacientes (3/6) apresentou reações de hipersensibilidade leves e foi tratada com anti-H1 e/ou corticoide oral. O ID positivo foi significativamente relacionado à reação à vacina (p = 0,0016). Conclusão: Concluiuse ser possível vacinar alérgicos a ovo, com um protocolo seguro, mesmo em paciente comprovadamente anafilático. É necessária uma unidade especializada para sua realização, com capacidade de controlar possíveis situações de risco.

Introduction: The yellow fever vaccine (YFV) is recommended in endemic areas, but represents a risk for egg allergic (EA) patients, as it is cultivated in chicken embryos. Objective: This study aimed to describe the outcomes of YFV in patients with confirmed egg allergy. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in a quaternary hospital, from January to October 2018. EA was diagnosed through oral food challenge (OFC) or recent history of anaphylaxis following egg contact in the past 6 months or allergic reaction in the past 2 months with positive specific immunoglobulin E (IgE). Skin prick testing (SPT) with YFV was performed in all participants. If SPT was negative, an intradermal test (IDT) was performed at 1:100 dilution. If IDT was negative, a full dose of YFV was administered. If SPT was positive, the YFV was administered using a graded-dose protocol. Results: Among 78 patients with prior history of EA, 43 were confirmed (30 male to 13 female, median age of 2.7 years). Thirty patients had a positive OFC, seven reported recent anaphylaxis, and six had reactions in the past 2 months with positive specific IgE. During OFC, 12 patients had anaphylaxis and 18 had urticaria and/or angioedema or vomiting. SPT with YFV was negative in all patients (43). IDT was negative in 37 patients, who received a full dose of YFV, uneventfully. Six patients had a positive IDT and received the YFV in graded doses; half of them had a mild reaction controlled with antihistamines and three patients received the vaccine without reactions. Positive IDT was significantly related to vaccine reaction (p=0.0016). Conclusion: The YFV using a specific protocol was safe even in anaphylactic patients. An appropriate setting is required in order to control possible adverse events.

A case of rapid desensitization for rituximab-induced delayed hypersensitivity reaction

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody used for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions to rituximab is well known, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions to rituximab are also reported. Desensitization is commonly used to prevent immediate hypersensitivity reactions, but recently there have been cases of successful desensitization therapy for delayed hypersensitivity reactions. A 66-year-old patient who underwent rituximab treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma showed repeated rituximab-induced delayed hypersensitivity reactions with whole body rashes. Intravenous rapid desensitization was performed by using a 1-bottle, 11-step protocol for 6 cycles and thereafter hypersensitivity reaction did not recur. We herein reported a case of delayed hypersensitivity reaction caused by rituximab, which was successfully desensitized using our 11-step protocol.

Safety of Ultra-rush Schedule of Subcutaneous Allergen Immunotherapy With House Dust Mite Extract Conducted in an Outpatient Clinic in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis and Allergic Rhinitis

PURPOSE: Ultra-rush schedule of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (UR-SCIT) administering maximum maintenance dose of allergen extract within one day can save time and effort for allergen immunotherapy in patients with allergic disease. However, UR-SCIT is associated with an increased risk of systemic reaction (SR) and typically has been conducted in a hospital admission setting. To overcome disadvantages of UR-SCIT, we evaluated the safety of UR-SCIT conducted in an outpatient clinic in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and allergic rhinitis (AR). METHODS: UR-SCIT was performed in 538 patients with AD and/or AR sensitized to house dust mite (HDM). A maximum maintenance dose of tyrosine-adsorbed HDM extract (1 mL of maintenance concentration) was divided into 4 increasing doses (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 mL) and administered to the patients by subcutaneous injection at 2-hour intervals for 8 hours in an outpatient clinic. SRs associated with UR-SCIT were classified according to the World Allergy Organization grading system. RESULTS: SR was observed in 12 of 538 patients (2.2%) with AD and/or AR during UR-SCIT. The severity grades of the observed SRs were mild-to-moderate (grade 1 in 7 patients, grade 2 in 4 patients, and grade 3 in 1 patient). The scheduled 4 increasing doses of HDM extract could be administered in 535 of 538 patients (99.4%) except 3 patients who experienced SR before administration of the last scheduled dose. SR was observed within 2 hours in 11 patients after administration of the scheduled doses of HDM extract except one patient who experienced a grade 2 SR at 5.5 hours after administration of the last scheduled dose. CONCLUSIONS: UR-SCIT with tyrosine-adsorbed HDM extract conducted in an outpatient clinic was tolerable in patients with AD and AR. UR-SCIT can be a useful method to start a SCIT in patients with AD and AR.